Loss and Damage: these two words have become synonymous with the stark reality of climate change consequences.

At a governmental level: discussion is on-going on how to set up the fund (Loss and Damage Fund) that should address the financial needs of vulnerable nations faced with severe floods, droughts, or extreme heatwaves (see COP28 [1]). The fact remains that a country's infrastructure and economy are directly affected by such events including the hotel real estate sector.

At a business level: climate-induced damages can lead to significant financial distress for hotel companies due to direct costs (e.g. building repair costs, displacement of workforce) and indirect impacts (e.g. disruption in economic activities) as well as depreciating the real estate value significantly.

Climate risks and their influence on property asset valuations have been under debate for years. Experts[2] point out that hotel properties not incorporating sustainable features, or those with higher exposure to environmental risks are being sold at a lower price than their market value (i.e. Brown discount). The readiness of investors to pay for properties that have sustainable features (i.e. green premiums), on the other hand, remains limited.

Despite growing climate change concerns and with destinations increasingly exposed to greater climate risks, the current hotel pipeline nevertheless shows a sharp increase in the development of hotels in the upscale and luxury market [3] including construction in high risk areas[4]. Due to the nature of their operations and construction requirements with extensive facilities, luxury hotels are considerably more impactful in terms of high resource consumption (i.e. carbon footprint, energy usage and water consumption[5]). Overall, the hotel construction pipeline suggests an industry undeterred by mounting environmental challenges…

That raises three questions (feel free to tackle only one question of your choice, or all of course):

  1. As hotel asset valuations are increasingly linked to sustainability features and environmental risk exposure, do you foresee this trend changing the overall approach to hotel development and, if so, how?
  2. Data suggest that the luxury hotel construction pipeline is unaffected by climate change concerns. What mitigation strategies needs to be adopted by the hospitality sector at this point to live up to the promise of decarbonization?
  3. And more blatantly: Should the industry refrain from developing new hotels in risk areas?

References

[1] UNFCC. (2023). UN Climate Change Conference - United Emirates Nov/Dec 2023. https://unfccc.int/cop28
[2] Lee, I. (2023, Aug. 06). Investor appetite for luxury hotels continues despite environmental challenges. https://www.hospitalityinvestor.com/esg/investor-appetite-luxury-hotels-continues-despite-environmental-challenges
[3] Lodging Econometrics. (2023, Aug 30). Three Chain Scales Hit Record-High Project Counts in the Global Pipeline at Q2. https://lodgingeconometrics.com/three-chain-scales-hit-record-high-project-counts-in-the-global-pipeline-at-q2/
[4] GermanWatch. (2021). Global Climate Risk Index 2021. https://www.germanwatch.org/en/19777
[5] CHSB Index. (2023). Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index 2023. Cornell University Library. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/113258

Chalana Perera
Chalana Perera
Founder – RETRACE™ Hospitality

As hotel asset valuations are increasingly linked to sustainability features and environmental risk exposure, do you foresee this trend changing the overall approach to hotel development and, if so, how?

Yes, I believe this trend will change the overall approach to valuing, developing and operating hotels. Investors, developers and operators will have to adapt to changing regulations and ever-evolving policies, net-zero targets and other decarbonization legislation alongside consumer demand for more responsible accommodation options.

Such changes will mandate better practices in the development and use of land, the design and construction methods employed in hotel development, the choice of materials, building footprint and volume, energy consumption, waste management and most critically, the enhancement and well-being of native biodiversity and upliftment of local communities and cultural heritage. Hotel developers will need to employ local biodiversity and ecosystems experts (scientists, ecologists, etc.), architects and designers will look increasingly towards biomimicry and biophilic design and contractors will have to invest in R&D to develop less extractive construction methods and materials, while delivering built environments that contribute positively to global climate targets.

Developers and investors will seek out operators who are well-nuanced in environmentally sensitive best practices for hospitality operations, including but not limited to: circular operating models (zero or low-waste), localizing supply chains, limiting resource-intensive ancillary and extra services, placing employee well-being at the center of operations, and ecosystems and resource regeneration efforts (waste water treatment, conversion of waste to energy, etc).

Other measures such as air, water and soil quality and biodiversity indices should determine if and how a hotel can be developed at a specific location. KPIs of development must include factually representative ‘quality of life’ indices for local communities as well. As much as guest review scores are important to the success and valuation of a hotel, the life satisfaction (i.e. ‘Happiness Index’) of the local community may play a pivotal role in determining property valuations in the future.

Data suggest that the luxury hotel construction pipeline is unaffected by climate change concerns. What mitigation strategies needs to be adopted by the hospitality sector at this point to live up to the promise of decarbonization?

Key to mitigating climate change risks is firstly understanding the ecological nuances and biodiversity make-up of a specific location. This requires looking at the ecological history of a location. Such an approach is applicable to all geographies across regions, including urban, suburban and rural locations. The hospitality sector needs to recognize the importance of ‘sense of place’ – understanding the natural balance and carrying capacity with as much scientific detail and evidence-based research as possible ahead of developing and operating in a specific location. Identifying and working within carrying capacity, carbon sequestration potential and stringent resource management are key to living up to decarbonization targets. Just as hospitality investors make financial data-driven investment decisions, hospitality investors need to make science-based decisions. Traditional due diligence and project underwriting metrics will no longer suffice.

And more blatantly: Should the industry refrain from developing new hotels in risk areas?

By and large the hospitality industry should certainly refrain from developing new hotels in risk areas. There is one exception perhaps, and that is if the new “hotel” development serves to demonstrate and embody scientifically proven decarbonization best practices and/or regenerative principals that restore and revive the health and integrity of a destination – to help combat the impacts of climate change. If applying the principles of regenerative development, hotel investor-developer-operators can safeguard and improve the future of ‘at risk’ areas. Bringing traditional or non-regenerative hotel projects to at-risk areas would serve detrimental to all stakeholders and ultimately compromise investor returns. Regenerative properties, those that exist to enhance the well-being of native ecosystems, local communities and both guests and staff alike, intend to transform risk into long-term opportunity and well-being for all stakeholders.

View all 15 views in this viewpoint